&lt;p&gt;Tron founder Justin Sun has filed a federal lawsuit against World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the DeFi project closely tied to President Donald Trump and his family. The suit, lodged on April 21, 2026, in a California federal court, accuses WLFI of freezing Sun&#039;s massive $75 million token holdings and embedding secret &quot;backdoor&quot; functions in its smart contracts. Sun, a prominent crypto entrepreneur known for his bold investments and recent $10 million SEC settlement over unrelated fraud allegations, was once WLFI&#039;s biggest cheerleader. He poured $30 million into the project in late 2024, right before the WLFI token launch, earning him an advisory role and public praise for backing what he called the Trump family&#039;s &quot;excellent project.&quot; By early 2025, his stake had ballooned to about $75 million, including 540 million unlocked tokens and 2.4 billion locked ones across 2.9 billion WLFI tokens total.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;The Freeze That Sparked the Feud&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Trouble brewed in September 2025 when WLFI suddenly froze Sun&#039;s wallet. Sun claims the project hid a &quot;backdoor blacklisting function&quot; in its smart contracts, a tool letting issuers freeze or seize tokens without warning, flying in the face of DeFi&#039;s decentralization promise. He says this stripped his voting rights on governance and ignored his pleas to unfreeze, with WLFI even threatening to burn his holdings permanently. Sun went public on X (formerly Twitter), blasting the move as anti-decentralized. WLFI fired back, calling it a standard security step applied to many wallets and teasing its own lawsuit, posting: &quot;We have the contracts. We have the evidence. We have the truth. See you in court, pal.&quot; Despite talks, no resolution came, pushing Sun to court.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Lawsuit Details&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The complaint packs serious punches: breach of contract, fraud in the inducement, conversion, unjust enrichment, and declaratory relief. Sun wants an immediate unfreeze, unspecified damages, and a court order barring WLFI from tampering with his tokens. &quot;I have always been, and remain, an ardent supporter,&quot; Sun posted on X, framing it as protecting token holder rights. WLFI, launched in late 2024 with Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. deeply involved, issues the WLFI token and USD1 stablecoin. It&#039;s positioned as a Trump-brand crypto powerhouse, but this suit spotlights risks in politically linked ventures.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Crypto Ties to Trump Under Scrutiny&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sun&#039;s history adds spice. The Chinese-born billionaire settled SEC charges in March 2026 for $10 million over wash trading TRX and BTT tokens, plus undisclosed celeb endorsements. Paused post-Trump&#039;s 2025 inauguration, it underscores regulatory flux in crypto. This isn&#039;t just personal; it&#039;s a test for WLFI&#039;s credibility. With over 76% of voting tokens in 10 wallets (per Sun&#039;s earlier critique), centralization whispers grow louder. A win for Sun could unlock billions in frozen assets across crypto, forcing projects to disclose blacklist powers upfront.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;What Happens Next?&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The case heads to discovery, where smart contract code and internal chats could spill secrets. WLFI insists it&#039;s routine security; Sun calls it a trap. Markets barely blinked but eyes are on Trump&#039;s circle amid his pro-crypto stance. For investors, it&#039;s a red flag: Even blue-chip backers like Sun face freezes in &quot;decentralized&quot; setups. As Sun fights for his stake, this saga could redefine token rights in the Trump-era crypto boom.&lt;/p&gt;

Justin Sun Sues Trump-Backed WLFI

&lt;p&gt;Ripple has announced a clear, multi-phase plan to make the XRP Ledger fully resistant to quantum threats by 2028. This positions the network as one of the first layer-1 blockchains to tackle the risks from quantum computing. The roadmap, revealed in April 2026, aims for a completely &amp;ldquo;post-quantum-ready&amp;rdquo; XRPL while maintaining fast, low-cost settlement essential for Ripple&amp;rsquo;s payment and token-transfer functions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Why quantum resistance matters&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Quantum computers are still in their early stages, but recent breakthroughs at labs like Google Quantum AI show that powerful machines could eventually break the elliptic-curve cryptography used in most current blockchains. In that case, attackers could gather existing signed transactions and later decrypt private keys to steal assets. This &amp;ldquo;harvest-now, decrypt-later&amp;rdquo; risk is now something Ripple regards as credible, not just theoretical. Projects like Bitcoin and Ethereum have talked about moving to post-quantum systems, but Ripple&#039;s 2028 deadline provides XRPL with a clear timeline for migration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;The four-phase 2028 roadmap&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ripple&#039;s approach is divided into four phases, starting now and leading to full quantum-proof operation by 2028. The first phase focuses on contingency planning, which includes a &amp;ldquo;Q-Day&amp;rdquo; protocol that would trigger an emergency switch to quantum-safe accounts if a serious flaw in current cryptographic standards is detected. This setup allows the network to quickly respond without needing a complete protocol overhaul, while still keeping user funds secure. By mid-2026, the second phase should finish a detailed security evaluation and start testing post-quantum digital signatures on XRPL-derived testnets. Early work has already implemented ML-DSA-style quantum-safe signatures on XRPL AlphaNet and similar environments to check performance and interoperability. This testing phase lets Ripple and validators refine algorithms and processes before making changes to the mainnet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Hybrid rollout and key rotation&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The third phase introduces a mixed cryptographic model where XRPL will run both traditional and post-quantum signatures side by side. In this setup, wallets and exchanges can gradually adopt quantum-safe keys while existing accounts continue to function as normal. One of XRPL&amp;rsquo;s strengths is its ability to rotate keys: users can change their public keys without moving assets, something Ripple plans to use heavily during the transition. According to internal estimates from analysts, only a small portion of XRP currently faces quantum risks due to frequent key rotation and multi-currency usage. Nevertheless, Ripple views the entire ledger as a long-term store of value, so proactive measures to strengthen security fit into its broader strategy for institutional and cross-border payments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Quantum-proof by 2028&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By 2028, Ripple intends for XRPL to be fully quantum-resistant or to have a well-defined and secure backup plan if new vulnerabilities arise. The company is collaborating closely with outside partners like Project Eleven, which is helping speed up validator-node testing and early custody prototypes for quantum-safe accounts. Ripple&amp;rsquo;s cryptography team is also reviewing how on-chain signatures and replay-protection systems function under post-quantum conditions. If everything goes according to plan, Ripple&amp;rsquo;s goal of being quantum-proof by 2028 could give XRP a significant advantage in regulated markets where security and longevity are crucial.&lt;/p&gt;

XRP Ledger will gain quantum-proof security by 2028.

&lt;p&gt;A major security breach at KelpDAO has rocked the DeFi ecosystem, with attackers siphoning over $280 million from the protocol&amp;rsquo;s rsETH cross‑chain bridge in what is now the largest single DeFi exploit of 2026. The attack unfolded on April 19, 2026, when a vulnerability in KelpDAO&amp;rsquo;s LayerZero‑powered bridge allowed an attacker to mint roughly 116,500 rsETH tokens, or about 18% of the token&amp;rsquo;s circulating supply, worth roughly a quarter‑billion dollars at current prices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;How the exploit unfolded&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KelpDAO is a liquid restaking protocol that lets users deposit ETH, route it through EigenLayer‑style protocols for extra yield, and receive rsETH (restaked ETH) as a tradable receipt. Part of that infrastructure relies on a cross‑chain bridge built on LayerZero, which manages messaging between Ethereum and about 20 other blockchains, including Arbitrum, Base, Linea, and Blast. According to on‑chain analysis and reports from security sleuths, the attacker managed to forge a cross‑chain message that tricked the bridge into believing a valid instruction had arrived from another network. This triggered the release of 116,500 rsETH to an attacker‑controlled address without any corresponding deposit of real collateral. Moments later, the malicious rsETH was deposited into major lending markets such as Aave V3 and V4, where the hacker borrowed large amounts of ETH and other assets against the fake tokens.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Contagion across DeFi&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The incident has triggered a cascade of countermeasures across the DeFi stack. Aave froze rsETH markets on Ethereum and Arbitrum within hours, while SparkLend, Fluid, and several other protocols either paused or hardened their rsETH‑related positions to limit exposure to potential bad debt. A token for Aave slipped by roughly 10&amp;ndash;13% as markets priced in the risk of losses. At least nine protocols have already suspended or restricted operations involving rsETH, and total value withdrawn from DeFi platforms in the wake of the incident is estimated at over $5.4 billion as users scramble to pull funds amid heightened security fears. Platforms such as Lido Finance and Ethena have also taken precautionary steps, with Lido pausing new deposits into certain products that carry rsETH exposure and Ethena temporarily halting its LayerZero‑based OFT bridges as a risk‑mitigation move.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;KelpDAO&amp;rsquo;s response&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KelpDAO acknowledged the breach in a statement on X (Twitter), saying it had detected &amp;ldquo;suspicious cross‑chain activity involving rsETH&amp;rdquo; and had paused rsETH contracts while it collaborates with LayerZero, auditors, and external security experts to investigate the root cause. The protocol has not yet disclosed a detailed post‑mortem, but early analyses suggest the flaw lies in the messaging and verification layer of the bridge, rather than in the core restaking validator set or Ethereum consensus itself. The hack underscores the risks of cross‑chain interoperability and the concentration of risk in a handful of widely‑used messaging infrastructures such as LayerZero. It also highlights how a single vulnerability in a restaking protocol can ripple through lending markets, stablecoins, and multi‑chain liquidity layers, turning a mid‑sized protocol exploit into a system‑wide stress test.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;What it means for the market&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For users, the incident is a stark reminder to evaluate bridge‑ and restaking‑related risks before locking capital into yield‑focused products. The KelpDAO exploit alone exceeds 60% of the total losses recorded in the first quarter of 2026, underscoring how a single event can dramatically reshape the year&amp;rsquo;s security narrative. As investigations continue and affected protocols work through recovery plans, the broader DeFi community is likely to see tighter collateral requirements, more conservative oracle integrations, and renewed scrutiny of cross‑chain designs.&lt;/p&gt;

KelpDAO Suffers Major Exploit

&lt;p&gt;Tether to inject up to $127.5 million into Drift Protocol as part of a broader $150 million recovery effort, after the Solana‑based perpetuals exchange suffered one of the largest breaches in DeFi history earlier this month. The deal marks a rare large‑scale rescue of a hacked protocol and signals Tether&amp;rsquo;s growing willingness to use its balance sheet to stabilize key trading venues in the USD₮ ecosystem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Scale and mechanics of the rescue&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Drift revealed in early April that attackers had siphoned roughly $285&amp;ndash;295 million from its platform, primarily in USDC, in what the team later tied to a North Korea‑linked threat group. In response, the project announced a partnership with Tether and &amp;ldquo;other partners&amp;rdquo; to assemble a recovery package of up to nearly $150 million, of which Tether will contribute $127.5 million while the remainder is covered by undisclosed backers. The support is structured as a mix of instruments: a $100 million revenue‑linked credit facility, an ecosystem grant, and loans to market makers, all funneled into a dedicated user‑recovery pool. Drift has committed that a significant share of its future trading revenue will be directed into this pool, with the goal of repaying roughly $295 million in total user losses over time. To operationalize payouts, the team plans to issue special claim tokens for affected users, which will entitle holders to tap the compensation fund as liquidity and revenue grow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Shift from USDC to USDT as core settlement&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A central feature of the rescue is Drift&amp;rsquo;s planned migration from USDC to USDT as the primary quote and collateral asset on its platform. The project&amp;rsquo;s founders have publicly criticized Circle, issuer of USDC, for not freezing the hacker‑controlled wallets, noting that over $60 million in USDC was ultimately withdrawn from the breached accounts. Moving to Tether&amp;rsquo;s stablecoin is intended to deepen Drift&amp;rsquo;s integration with the wider USDT‑denominated liquidity layer on Solana, while also aligning incentives with a sponsor that now has a direct economic stake in the protocol&amp;rsquo;s comeback. The transition is expected to reshape capital flows on Solana&amp;rsquo;s derivatives stack, as Drift hosts one of the chain&amp;rsquo;s largest decentralized perpetual‑futures markets by open interest. Analysts suggest the shift could drive additional volume toward USDT‑based pools and away from USDC‑centric venues, especially if other DeFi protocols watch how smoothly Drift&amp;rsquo;s relaunch goes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Strategic implications&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For Tether, the move goes beyond simple charity: it consolidates the company&amp;rsquo;s position as a stabilization force in the broader digital‑asset ecosystem. By backing a high‑profile, high‑volume protocol, Tether effectively reduces the systemic risk of a disorderly collapse and defends its own stablecoin&amp;rsquo;s dominance in on‑chain trading. The revenue‑linked structure also gives Tether an upside on Drift&amp;rsquo;s future success, blending rescue capital with a quasi‑equity‑style return.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the wider DeFi world, the Drift&amp;ndash;Tether pact raises delicate questions about centralized backstops in otherwise &amp;ldquo;decentralized&amp;rdquo; protocols. Some community members welcome the speed of intervention, arguing that user‑compensation plans are preferable to a slow, ad‑hoc bailout. Others worry that repeated corporate rescues could normalize the idea that large issuers can pick winners and losers, potentially tilting governance and economic flows toward a few entrenched players rather than truly open markets.&lt;/p&gt;

Tether Supports Drift with $127M After Hack Incident

&lt;p&gt;The Ethereum Foundation has rolled out a $1 million security subsidy program aimed at slashing the steep costs of smart contract audits. Announced on April 14, 2026, this initiative couldn&#039;t come at a better time as Ethereum continues its aggressive push toward unbreakable security standards.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;What the Program Delivers&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Ethereum Security Subsidy Program offers qualifying projects up to 30% coverage of their blockchain audit expenses, with fresh cohorts selected every month. Partnering with advisory powerhouse Areta, the Foundation is making professional reviews accessible to more Ethereum mainnet builders. Heavyweights like Nethermind and Chainlink Labs are on board too, vetting applications to ensure funds hit the most deserving teams. This is a structured lifeline. Developers submit through Areta&#039;s marketplace, undergo rigorous checks, and get reimbursed post-audit. Early buzz from Areta CEO Findlay Boothroyd highlights how this bridges the gap for resource-strapped teams, potentially averting exploits that have plagued DeFi in the past.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Why Now?&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ethereum&#039;s ecosystem has matured, but so have the stakes. With trillions in value at play, smart contract bugs aren&#039;t just costly, they&#039;re existential. This subsidy ties directly into the Foundation&#039;s March 2026 &quot;CROPS&quot; mandate, prioritizing censorship resistance, open source, privacy, and security. It&#039;s part of the broader Trillion Dollar Security Initiative, led by figures like Fredrik, focusing on post-quantum readiness and execution-layer safeguards. Recent data underscores the urgency. In 2025 alone, Ethereum-based hacks drained over $1.7 billion, per industry trackers. By subsidizing audits, the Foundation isn&#039;t just reacting; it&#039;s preempting disasters, aligning with 2026 dev roadmaps emphasizing quantum-resistant wallets and blob censorship resistance. As Ethereum eyes 128-bit security for zkEVMs this year, cheaper audits mean faster, safer rollouts for L2s and DeFi protocols.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Ecosystem Reactions&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The crypto community lit up on X and Discord post-announcement. Builders hailed it as &quot;a subsidy that subsidizes survival,&quot; while critics quibble over selection criteria. Yet, with monthly cohorts and partners like Chainlink ensuring transparency, it feels merit-based. Areta&#039;s marketplace alone expands options beyond the usual suspects like Trail of Bits or OpenZeppelin, democratizing access.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Broader Implications for Web3&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This isn&#039;t isolated. It dovetails with Ethereum&#039;s 2026 priorities: scaling L1, blobs, and UX while fortifying the core. For global devs, it&#039;s a signal: Ethereum bets big on security to lure institutions. Expect ripple effects. More audits mean fewer Rekt News headlines, boosting TVL and adoption. As President Trump&#039;s pro-crypto policies energize markets in this April 2026 landscape, Ethereum&#039;s move positions it as the fortified backbone of finance&#039;s future.&lt;/p&gt;

Ethereum Foundation Rolls Out $1 Million Security Initiative

&lt;p&gt;An attacker took advantage of a flaw in Polkadot-based Hyperbridge, minting an astonishing 1 billion bridged DOT tokens worth over $1.19 billion on Ethereum. The attacker ended up with only $237,000 after selling them. This incident, first reported by security firm CertiK on April 12, 2026, highlights the ongoing vulnerabilities in cross-chain bridges, even though they promise easy interoperability. While Polkadot&#039;s main network is secure, the event unsettled the markets, causing DOT to drop about 5%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;The Exploit Unraveled&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hyperbridge, a zkSNARK-powered system on Polkadot, helps transfer assets between chains like Polkadot and Ethereum. The attack targeted its EthereumHost contract, which mishandled the validation of cross-chain messages before sending them to the TokenGateway. The attacker submitted a fake message through the dispatchIncoming function, bypassing state proof checks because of an all-zeros commitment that misled the system into acceptance. This gave the hacker admin control over the bridged DOT token contract through a changeAdmin call. In one quick transaction, they minted 1 billion tokens and sent them through Odos Router V3 into a Uniswap V4 DOT-ETH pool. Multiple swaps yielded about 108.2 ETH, worth roughly $237,000 at the time, as low liquidity in the pool led to significant price slippage. On-chain investigators traced the funds quickly, but the damage was limited to Ethereum&#039;s bridged assets.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Why the Haul Was So Small&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Interestingly, the shallow liquidity that affected large traders worked in DeFi&#039;s favour in this case. The bridged DOT pool couldn&#039;t handle the influx of 1 billion tokens without crashing the price, which limited the attacker&#039;s profits. If this had targeted a deeper pool or more valuable asset, losses could have reached hundreds of millions. After the exploit, DOT hovered around $1.20, down slightly from $1.22, showing market nervousness but posing no systemic threat to Polkadot&#039;s main network. This follows a troubling trend in 2026: bridges are often hacked, holding excessive admin controls over tokens on destination chains. Last month, Solana&#039;s Drift Protocol lost $270 million to an exploit, while social engineering attacks elsewhere revealed infrastructure weaknesses. Hyperbridge&#039;s lack of communication so far leaves users uncertain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Broader Implications&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Polkadot, trading between $1.17 and $1.24 USD as of April 13, experienced a 4-5% price fluctuation but remained firm, underlining the relay chain&#039;s strength. The ecosystem, including parachains like Hyperbridge Nexus, promotes zk-proofs for better scalability, yet validation issues remain. CertiK&#039;s warning highlighted the gateway flaw and called for audits of similar systems. For users, this serves as a reminder to closely examine bridges beyond the hype. Native DOT tokens are safe, but bridged versions require caution. Developers must focus on proof verification and time locks. As the crypto world looks towards multi-chain futures, incidents like this highlight the need for secure systems.&lt;/p&gt;

Attacker Exploits Polkadot-Based Hyperbridge

&lt;p class=&quot;mb-2 text-sm text-gray-800&quot;&gt;In partnership with Oxbull - Cryptobuddy community members will get &lt;span class=&quot;text-blue-900 font-bold&quot;&gt;10&lt;/span&gt; exclusive whitelist spots (Tier 3) for the upcoming IDO.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;mb-2 text-sm text-gray-800&quot;&gt;MetaFighter is a skill-based Play-to-Earn fighting game in Binance Smart Chain Network which captures the essence of arcade fighting classics like Street Fighter, Virtua Fighter and Soul Calibur, while delivering an in -game economy that rewards players for their combat prowess. Launching on Oxbull with &lt;span class=&quot;text-blue-900 font-bold&quot;&gt;130K&lt;/span&gt; initial market cap&lt;/p&gt;

Uponly × Cryptobuddy Airdrop Giveaway

In partnership with Oxbull - Cryptobuddy community members will get 10 exclusive whitelist spots (Tier 3) for the upcoming IDO.MetaFighter is a skill-based Play-to-Earn fighting game in Binance Smart Chain Network which captures the essence of arcade fighting classics like Street Fighter, Virtua Fighter and Soul Calibur, while delivering an in -game economy that rewards players for their combat prowess. Launching on Oxbull with 130K initial market cap

MetaFighter Oxbull IDO - Whitelist for Cryptobuddy Community

In partnership with Oxbull - Cryptobuddy community members will get 10 exclusive whitelist spots (Tier 3) for the upcoming IDO.Fantom Pad has developed the first Hybrid Incubator-DEX built on the Fantom network, creating a safer, seamless environment for all emerging projects. Launching on Oxbull with 144K initial market cap

FantomPad Oxbull IDO - Whitelist for Cryptobuddy Community

FantomPad

Oxbull

Cryptobuddy

CryptobuddyAnnouncement

In partnership with Oxbull - Cryptobuddy community members will get 10 exclusive whitelist spots (Tier 3) for the upcoming IDO.Shark Race Club is an interesting and unique NFT play-to-earn racing game that is featuring a variety of Shark NFT Characters. Launching on Oxbull with 328K initial market cap

Shark Race Club Oxbull IDO - Whitelist for Cryptobuddy Community

SharkRace Club

In partnership with Oxbull - Cryptobuddy community members will get 10 exclusive whitelist spots (Tier 3) for the upcoming IDO.Crimecash is a game where you can buy weapons and loot other players. Crimecash is launching on Oxbull

CrimeCash Oxbull IDO - Whitelist for Cryptobuddy Community

CrimeCash

XYRO is an AI-powered gamified trading platform that leverages gamification and social features to redefine crypto, making it accessible and engaging. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; XYRO operates in the rapidly growing and high-potential gamified social trading and Web3 space, leveraging both AI and gamification to drive user engagement. By combining advanced AI insights with engaging gamified experiences, the platform becomes more intuitive, accessible, and appealing to a wide range of users. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; XYRO is an AI-powered, fully decentralized platform that combines gamification and social trading, making crypto participation engaging and accessible for both newcomers and experienced traders.

Zaya AI works on combating cancer through an innovative ecosystem. By seamlessly integrating the latest AI technologies with state-of-the-art medical screening procedures, they strive to revolutionize early detection, prevention, and treatment strategies. This comprehensive approach holds the promise of saving countless lives by identifying and addressing malignancies at their earliest stages when intervention is most effective.

Base

DTRXBT by Virtuals is a token on the Base blockchain that grants holders access to exclusive AI-generated insights from the Decentralized Tech Researchers (DTR) alpha group, using advanced algorithms to find high-probability market signals.

Cryptocurrency Information Aggregator & Research Platform

Trending Cryptocurrencies

Airdrops

IDO/ICO Events

Upcoming

Recently Added

Closed

Fear and greed index

Our Articles

Justin Sun Sues Trump-Backed WLFI

XRP Ledger will gain quantum-proof security by 2028.

KelpDAO Suffers Major Exploit

Tether Supports Drift with $127M After Hack Incident

Ethereum Foundation Rolls Out $1 Million Security Initiative

Attacker Exploits Polkadot-Based Hyperbridge

Subscribe to Newsletter

Company

Quick Links

Community

Company

Quick Links

Community